RFC 1481 HISTORIC ROUTING · IPV4

CIDR: IAB Recommendation for an Intermediate Strategy to Address the Issue of Scaling

Endorses CIDR as an interim way to conserve IPv4 addresses and limit routing-table growth.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
July 1993
AUTHORS
C. Huitema
STREAM
Legacy
EXISTING IP ADDRESS SIZE
32 bits
DOI
10.17487/RFC1481

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Network Working Group                                 C. Huitema, Chair
Request for Comments: 1481                  Internet Architecture Board
                                                              July 1993


           IAB Recommendation for an Intermediate Strategy to
                     Address the Issue of Scaling

Status of this Memo

   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
   not specify an Internet standard.  Distribution of this memo is
   unlimited.

Recommendation

   Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) proposes strategies for address
   assignment of the existing IP address space with a view to conserve
   the address space and stem the explosive growth of routing tables in
   default-route-free routers run by transit routing domain providers
   [1].  CIDR is proposed as an immediate term strategy to extend the
   life of the current 32 bit IP address space.  This strategy presumes
   that a suitable long term solution is being addressed within the
   Internet technical community.

   The basic components of the CIDR plan are: management of the
   allocation of Internet address space and provision of a mechanism for
   aggregation of routing information.  The IP community has published
   several RFCs and Internet-Drafts which describe the architecture for
   IP address assignment and routing protocols which will promote the
   deployment of CIDR.  These documents have led to changes in the way
   network address are allocated and have prompted enhancements to the
   inter-domain and intra-domain routing protocols.

   With the CIDR prompted changes in the management of the allocation of
   the Internet address space, allocation of blocks of Class C numbers
   leads to an explosion of the routing tables.  So, it is important
   that the techniques for aggregating information in the routing
   protocols keep pace with the change in the allocation of IP numbers.

   The IAB endorses the CIDR architecture and its implementation.  In
   addition, the IAB supports the actions taken by the IANA and
   InterNIC, the router vendors, and the network operators to implement
   CIDR to address the scaling problem that we are facing with the
   growth of the Internet.

References

   [1] Fuller, V., Li, T., Yu, J., and K. Varadhan, "Supernetting: an
       Address Assignment and Aggregation Strategy", RFC 1338, BARRNet,
       cisco, Merit, OARnet, June 1992.

   [2] Gerich, E., "Guidelines for management of IP Address Space", RFC
       1466, Merit, May 1993.

   [3] Topolcic, C., "Schedule for IP Address Space Management
       Guidelines", RFC 1367, CNRI, October 1992.

   [4] Rekhter, Y., and T. Li, "An Architecture for IP Address
       Allocation with CIDR", Work in Progress, January 1993.

   [5] Rekhter, Y., and C. Topolcic, "Exchanging Routing Information
       across Provider/Subscriber Boundaries in CIDR environment", Work
       in Progress, February 1993.

Security Considerations

   Security issues are not discussed in this memo.

Author's Address

   Christian Huitema
   INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis
   2004 Route des Lucioles
   BP 109
   F-06561 Valbonne Cedex
   France

   Phone: +33 93 65 77 15
   EMail: Christian.Huitema@MIRSA.INRIA.FR

ISO Plain Language

On this page
PROBLEMThe Internet's 32-bit IP address space and the routing tables in transit routers were both under pressure from rapid growth.
MECHANISMCIDR combines managed address allocation with route aggregation so that address blocks can be allocated efficiently and routing information can be summarized.
THE RECOMMENDATIONThe IAB endorses CIDR as an immediate-term strategy while the technical community works on a longer-term solution. Unit metadata classifies this RFC as Historic.

§1The Scaling Problem

The memo says Internet growth was putting pressure on two parts of the network. The existing 32-bit IP address space needed to be conserved, and routing tables in transit routers were growing rapidly.

Allocating blocks of Class C numbers could also increase routing-table entries unless routing protocols aggregated related routes.

The Internet needed to conserve addresses and control the number of routes that routers had to store. Address allocation and routing summaries needed to work together.

§1CIDR as an Interim Strategy

Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) combines management of IP address allocation with a way to aggregate routing information. The memo describes these as the two basic components of the plan.

It frames CIDR as an immediate-term strategy for extending the life of the existing 32-bit address space, while assuming that the technical community is addressing a longer-term solution.

CIDR changes how address blocks are assigned and how routers combine route information. The memo presents it as a way to buy time, not as the long-term solution itself.

§1IAB Endorsement

The IAB endorses the CIDR architecture and its implementation. It also supports the actions of IANA, InterNIC, router vendors, and network operators to put CIDR into practice.

The memo is informational and does not specify an Internet standard.

The IAB supports CIDR and the work to implement it. This memo is a recommendation, not a protocol specification.

§4References