CIDR: IAB Recommendation for an Intermediate Strategy to Address the Issue of Scaling
Endorses CIDR as an interim way to conserve IPv4 addresses and limit routing-table growth.
Huitema, C., "IAB Recommendation for an Intermediate Strategy to Address the Issue of Scaling", RFC 1481, DOI 10.17487/RFC1481, July 1993, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1481>.
@misc{rfc1481,
series = {Request for Comments},
number = 1481,
howpublished = {RFC 1481},
publisher = {RFC Editor},
doi = {10.17487/RFC1481},
url = {https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1481},
author = {C. Huitema},
title = {{IAB Recommendation for an Intermediate Strategy to Address the Issue of Scaling}},
pagetotal = 2,
year = 1993,
month = jul,
} RFC text
Contents
Network Working Group C. Huitema, Chair
Request for Comments: 1481 Internet Architecture Board
July 1993
IAB Recommendation for an Intermediate Strategy to
Address the Issue of Scaling
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard. Distribution of this memo is
unlimited.
Recommendation
Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) proposes strategies for address
assignment of the existing IP address space with a view to conserve
the address space and stem the explosive growth of routing tables in
default-route-free routers run by transit routing domain providers
[1]. CIDR is proposed as an immediate term strategy to extend the
life of the current 32 bit IP address space. This strategy presumes
that a suitable long term solution is being addressed within the
Internet technical community.
The basic components of the CIDR plan are: management of the
allocation of Internet address space and provision of a mechanism for
aggregation of routing information. The IP community has published
several RFCs and Internet-Drafts which describe the architecture for
IP address assignment and routing protocols which will promote the
deployment of CIDR. These documents have led to changes in the way
network address are allocated and have prompted enhancements to the
inter-domain and intra-domain routing protocols.
With the CIDR prompted changes in the management of the allocation of
the Internet address space, allocation of blocks of Class C numbers
leads to an explosion of the routing tables. So, it is important
that the techniques for aggregating information in the routing
protocols keep pace with the change in the allocation of IP numbers.
The IAB endorses the CIDR architecture and its implementation. In
addition, the IAB supports the actions taken by the IANA and
InterNIC, the router vendors, and the network operators to implement
CIDR to address the scaling problem that we are facing with the
growth of the Internet.
References
[1] Fuller, V., Li, T., Yu, J., and K. Varadhan, "Supernetting: an
Address Assignment and Aggregation Strategy", RFC 1338, BARRNet,
cisco, Merit, OARnet, June 1992.
[2] Gerich, E., "Guidelines for management of IP Address Space", RFC
1466, Merit, May 1993.
[3] Topolcic, C., "Schedule for IP Address Space Management
Guidelines", RFC 1367, CNRI, October 1992.
[4] Rekhter, Y., and T. Li, "An Architecture for IP Address
Allocation with CIDR", Work in Progress, January 1993.
[5] Rekhter, Y., and C. Topolcic, "Exchanging Routing Information
across Provider/Subscriber Boundaries in CIDR environment", Work
in Progress, February 1993.
Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
Author's Address
Christian Huitema
INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis
2004 Route des Lucioles
BP 109
F-06561 Valbonne Cedex
France
Phone: +33 93 65 77 15
EMail: Christian.Huitema@MIRSA.INRIA.FR
ISO Plain Language
On this page
§1The Scaling Problem
The memo says Internet growth was putting pressure on two parts of the network. The existing 32-bit IP address space needed to be conserved, and routing tables in transit routers were growing rapidly.
Allocating blocks of Class C numbers could also increase routing-table entries unless routing protocols aggregated related routes.
The Internet needed to conserve addresses and control the number of routes that routers had to store. Address allocation and routing summaries needed to work together.
§1CIDR as an Interim Strategy
Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) combines management of IP address allocation with a way to aggregate routing information. The memo describes these as the two basic components of the plan.
It frames CIDR as an immediate-term strategy for extending the life of the existing 32-bit address space, while assuming that the technical community is addressing a longer-term solution.
CIDR changes how address blocks are assigned and how routers combine route information. The memo presents it as a way to buy time, not as the long-term solution itself.
§1IAB Endorsement
The IAB endorses the CIDR architecture and its implementation. It also supports the actions of IANA, InterNIC, router vendors, and network operators to put CIDR into practice.
The memo is informational and does not specify an Internet standard.
The IAB supports CIDR and the work to implement it. This memo is a recommendation, not a protocol specification.