RFC 2659 EXPERIMENTAL HTML · SECURITY · S-HTTP

S-HTML: Security Extensions For HTML

HTML attributes can carry S-HTTP negotiation details for a link.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
August 1999
AUTHORS
E. Rescorla, A. Schiffman
STREAM
IETF
NEW ANCHOR ATTRIBUTES
DN, NONCE, CRYPTOPTS
NEW HTML ELEMENTS
CERTS, CRYPTOPTS
CERTIFICATE FORMATS
PEM and PKCS-7
DOI
10.17487/RFC2659

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Network Working Group                                         E. Rescorla
Requests for Comments: 2659                                    RTFM, Inc.
Category: Experimental                                       A. Schiffman
                                                     Terisa Systems, Inc.
                                                              August 1999


                      Security Extensions For HTML

Status of this Memo

   This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
   community.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
   Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
   Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

   This memo describes a syntax for embedding S-HTTP negotiation
   parameters in HTML documents.  S-HTTP, as described by RFC 2660,
   contains the concept of negotiation headers which reflect the
   potential receiver of a message's preferences as to which crypto-
   graphic enhancements should be applied to the message. This document
   describes a syntax for binding these negotiation parameters to HTML
   anchors.

   1.  Introduction

   2.  Anchor Attributes

   We define the following new anchor (and form submission) attributes:

        DN -- The distinguished name of the principal for whom the
        request should be encrypted when dereferencing the anchor's url.
        This need not be specified, but failure to do so runs the risk
        that the client will be unable to determine the DN and therefore
        will be unable to encrypt.  This should be specified in the form
        of RFC1485, using SGML quoting conventions as needed.

        NONCE -- A free-format string (appropriately SGML quoted) which
        is to be included in a SHTTP-Nonce: header (after SGML quoting
        is removed) when the anchor is dereferenced.

        CRYPTOPTS -- Cryptographic option information as described in
        [SHTTP]. Specifically, the <cryptopt-list> production.

2.1.  CERTS Element

   A new CERTS HTML element is defined, which carries a (not necessarily
   related) group of certificates provided as advisory data. The element
   contents are not intended to be displayed to the user. Certificate
   groups may be provided appropriate for either PEM or PKCS-7
   implementations. Such certificates are supplied in the HTML document
   for the convenience of the recipient, who might otherwise be unable
   to retrieve the certificate (chain) corresponding to a DN specified
   in an anchor.

   The format should be the same as that of the 'Certificate-Info'
   header line, of [SHTTP] except that the <Cert-Fmt> specifier should
   be provided as the FMT attribute in the tag.

   Multiple CERTS elements are permitted; it is suggested that CERTS
   elements themselves be included in the HTML document's HEAD element
   (in the hope that the data will not be displayed by S-HTTP oblivious
   but HTML compliant browsers.)

2.2.  CRYPTOPTS Element

   Cryptopts may also be broken out into an element and referred to in
   anchors by name. The NAME attribute specifies the name by which this
   element may be referred to in a CRYPTOPTS attribute in an anchor.
   Names must have a # as the leading character.

2.3.  HTML Example

   An example of cryptographic data embedded in an anchor, proceeded by
   a certificate group is provided below. Note the SGML quoting syntax
   used to supply embedded quotation marks.

           <CERTS FMT=PKCS-7>
           MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCAM
           IIBrTCCAUkCAgC2MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUAME0xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMSAwH
           gYDVQQKExdSU0EgRGF0YSBTZWN1cml0eSwgSW5jLjEcMBoGA1UECxMTUGVyc
           29uYSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZTAeFw05NDA0MDkwMDUwMzdaFw05NDA4MDIxODM4N
           TdaMGcxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMSAwHgYDVQQKExdSU0EgRGF0YSBTZWN1cml0e
           SwgSW5jLjEcMBoGA1UECxMTUGVyc29uYSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZTEYMBYGA1UEA
           xMPU2V0ZWMgQXN0cm9ub215MFwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADSwAwSAJBAMy8Q
           cW7RMrB4sTdQ8Nmb2DFmJmkWn+el+NdeamIDElX/qw9mIQu4xNj1FfepfJNx
           zPvA0OtMKhy6+bkrlyMEU8CAwEAATANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQIFAANPAAYn7jDgi
           rhiIL4wnP8nGzUisGSpsFsF4/7z2P2wqne6Qk8Cg/Dstu3RyaN78vAMGP8d8
           2H5+Ndfhi2mRp4YHiGHz0HlK6VbPfnyvS2wdjCCAccwggFRAgUCQAAAFDANB
           gkqhkiG9w0BAQIFADBfMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEgMB4GA1UEChMXUlNBIERhd
           GEgU2VjdXJpdHksIEluYy4xLjAsBgNVBAsTJUxvdyBBc3N1cmFuY2UgQ2Vyd
           GlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwHhcNOTQwMTA3MDAwMDAwWhcNOTYwMTA3M
           jM1OTU5WjBNMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEgMB4GA1UEChMXUlNBIERhdGEgU2Vjd
           XJpdHksIEluYy4xHDAaBgNVBAsTE1BlcnNvbmEgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUwaTANB
           gkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAANYADBVAk4GqghQDa9Xi/2zAdYEqJVIcYhlLN1FpI9tX
           Q1m6zZ39PYXK8Uhoj0Es7kWRv8hC04vqkOKwndWbzVtvoHQOmP8nOkkuBi+A
           QvgFoRcgOUCAwEAATANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQIFAANhAD/5Uo7xDdp49oZm9GoNc
           PhZcW1e+nojLvHXWAU/CBkwfcR+FSf4hQ5eFu1AjYv6Wqf430Xe9Et5+jgnM
           Tiq4LnwgTdA8xQX4elJz9QzQobkE3XVOjVAtCFcmiin80RB8AAAMYAAAAAAA
           AAAAA==
           </CERTS>
           <A name=foobar
           DN="CN=Setec Astronomy, OU=Persona Certificate,
               O=&quot;RSA Data Security, Inc.&quot;, C=US"
           CRYPTOPTS="SHTTP-Privacy-Enhancements: recv-refused=encrypt;
           SHTTP-Signature-Algorithms: recv-required=NIST-DSS"
           HREF="shttp://research.nsa.gov/skipjack-holes.html">
           Don't read this. </A>

3. Security Considerations

   This entire document is about security.

4. Authors' Addresses

   Eric Rescorla
   RTFM, Inc.
   30 Newell Road, #16
   East Palo Alto, CA 94303

   Phone: (650) 328-8631
   EMail: ekr@rtfm.com


   Allan M. Schiffman
   SPYRUS/Terisa
   5303 Betsy Ross Drive
   Santa Clara, CA 95054

   Phone: (408) 327-1901
   EMail: ams@terisa.com

5. References

   [SHTTP] Rescorla, E. and A. Schiffman, "The Secure HyperText Transfer
           Protocol", RFC 2660, August 1999.

6. Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.

ISO Plain Language

On this page
PROBLEMS-HTTP negotiation settings need a way to be associated with HTML links and form submissions.
MECHANISMThe RFC defines the DN, NONCE, and CRYPTOPTS anchor attributes, plus CERTS and CRYPTOPTS elements for certificate data and named cryptographic options.
WHAT IT DEFINESThe Experimental RFC describes a syntax for placing S-HTTP negotiation parameters in HTML documents.

§1Binding S-HTTP Settings to HTML

S-HTTP uses negotiation headers to express the receiver's preferences for cryptographic protections. RFC 2659 defines a syntax for binding those settings to HTML anchors and form submissions.

The RFC introduces three attributes: DN gives the distinguished name of the principal for whom the request should be encrypted; NONCE supplies a string for the SHTTP-Nonce header; and CRYPTOPTS carries cryptographic option information defined by S-HTTP.

HTML links and form submissions can carry S-HTTP settings. The settings can name the intended recipient, provide a nonce, and specify cryptographic options.

§2.1Certificates and Named Options

The CERTS element carries a group of certificates as advisory data. The contents are not intended for display. The RFC permits certificate groups in PEM or PKCS-7 formats and says they can help a recipient obtain a certificate chain for a distinguished name in an anchor.

A CRYPTOPTS element can hold options under a name. An anchor can refer to that name using its CRYPTOPTS attribute; the name must begin with a number sign. Multiple CERTS elements are permitted, and the RFC suggests placing them in the document's HEAD element.

A page can include certificates for the recipient and can define a named set of cryptographic options. A link can refer to that named set.

§2.3Example HTML Document

The example places a certificate group in a CERTS element with FMT=PKCS-7. An anchor then supplies a distinguished name and CRYPTOPTS values that describe S-HTTP privacy and signature-algorithm preferences.

The sample uses SGML quoting conventions to include quotation marks inside the distinguished name. Its anchor points to an S-HTTP URL.

The example puts certificate data in the document and places the recipient name and security settings on a link. The link uses an S-HTTP URL.

§3Security Considerations

The RFC states that the entire document is about security. It does not provide a separate list of security risks in its Security Considerations section.

This document describes security-related HTML syntax. Its security section offers no further risk analysis.

§5References