RFC 124 UNKNOWN ARPANET · ERRATA · HISTORY
Typographical error in RFC 107
A one-sentence correction to RFC 107.
RFC EDITOR
Melvin, J.T., "Typographical error in RFC 107", RFC 124, DOI 10.17487/RFC0124, April 1971, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc124>.
BIBTEX
@misc{rfc124,
series = {Request for Comments},
number = 124,
howpublished = {RFC 124},
publisher = {RFC Editor},
doi = {10.17487/RFC0124},
url = {https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc124},
author = {J.T. Melvin},
title = {{Typographical error in RFC 107}},
pagetotal = 1,
year = 1971,
month = apr,
} RFC text
NETWORK WORKING GROUP J. Melvin
Request for Comments #124 NIC
NIC #5840 19 April 1971
Typographical Error in RFC 107
Catagories: C
RFCs Obsoleted: none
RFCs Updated: 106
On page 7 of RFC 107, the RTS (1.) should be an STR.
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFC archives by BBN Corp. under the ]
[ direction of Alex McKenzie. 12/96 ]
ISO Plain Language
On this page
PROBLEMA command on page 7 of RFC 107 was printed incorrectly.
MECHANISMRFC 124 states that the item shown as RTS should be STR.
THE CORRECTIONRFC 124 updates RFC 107 with this correction.
§1The Corrected Command
The entire correction is one sentence: on page 7 of RFC 107, RTS (1.) should be an STR.
On page 7 of RFC 107, read STR where the text shows RTS.
§2An Erratum Issued as an RFC
RFC 124 is a short correction note dated 19 April 1971. The text does not define the meanings of RTS or STR; it only identifies the correction.
The note corrects a command name and does not explain the commands themselves.
§3What Changes in RFC 107
Readers of RFC 107 should apply this correction to the command shown on page 7. RFC 124 supplies no other protocol changes.
The correction applies only to the command on page 7 of RFC 107.