SRI Artificial Intelligence status report
SRI's AI group describes its planned ARPANET connection and research services.
Wilber, M., "SRI Artificial Intelligence status report", RFC 152, DOI 10.17487/RFC0152, May 1971, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc152>.
@misc{rfc152,
series = {Request for Comments},
number = 152,
howpublished = {RFC 152},
publisher = {RFC Editor},
doi = {10.17487/RFC0152},
url = {https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc152},
author = {M. Wilber},
title = {{SRI Artificial Intelligence status report}},
pagetotal = 1,
year = 1971,
month = may,
} RFC text
Network Working Group M. Wilber
Request for Comments #152 10 May 71
NIC #6756 SRAI
Category: G.3
Obsoletes: None
Updates: None
Response to RFC #116
SRI ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE STATUS REPORT
The Stanford Research Institute's Artificial Intelligence Group (SRAI
in the four-letter abbreviations) expects connection to the ARPA net as a
research center after conversion this summer to a TENEX from our current
PDP-10. Our connection will be through the IMP already at SRI for the
Network Information Center and through a PDP-15 serving our PDP-10 as a
controller of peripherals. Our hardware interface to the IMP is currently
in the bidding process, and we intend to use as much as possible of the
TENEX network software. (Probably all we will need to change is the lowest
level, most strongly hardware-oriented part of the NCP.)
The most optimistic estimate we can give for functional connection to
the network is mid-July 1971. We are currently devoting the energies of
our system support group to the accomodation of various hardware and design
changes, and so our contact with the Network Working Group has been only
minimal and passive. It is entirely conceivable that we may find our par-
ticipation tending to strength and activeness as we cross our other bridges.
We can project our participation in the network into the first few
months of our connection. We can support several simultaneous outside
users on a system nominally up during the business day and often up at
other times. Lapses in continuity of system operation are usually due to
scheduled maintenance or hardware failures and tend to occur at intervals
of either an hour or several days with remarkable consistency. The prin-
cipal service we offer to other network participants is the availability
of various parts of our own research software. The most notable examples
are QA3.6, a first-order resolution theorem prover; STRIPS, an extra-
logical problem solver; and possibly QA4, a language oriented toward
problem-solving strategies. The services we can anticipate requesting
of the network are of two kinds: We could conceivably use other people's
artificial intelligence programs on a trial basis; and we might use the
network to make occasional contact with other people in the network.
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
[ into the online RFC archives by BBN Corp. under the ]
[ direction of Alex McKenzie. 12/96 ]
ISO Plain Language
On this page
§1Preparing the SRI Connection
SRI's Artificial Intelligence Group expects to join the ARPANET as a research center after converting its PDP-10 to TENEX. It plans to connect through SRI's existing IMP, which already serves the Network Information Center, and use a PDP-15 to control peripherals.
The hardware interface was still being bid on. The group intended to reuse as much TENEX network software as possible and expected that changes might be limited to the hardware-oriented part of the Network Control Program.
SRI is changing its computer system before joining the network. It plans to reuse existing network software and connect through equipment already at SRI.
§2Expected Services and Participation
The group's most optimistic estimate for functional network connection was mid-July 1971. It expected to support several outside users at once, with the system normally available during business hours and often at other times. Maintenance and hardware failures could interrupt service.
SRI expected to make research software available, including QA3.6, STRIPS and possibly QA4. The group also hoped to try artificial-intelligence programs from other sites and use the network for occasional contact with network participants.
SRI expected to share several research programs and support a few outside users at once. It also hoped to try programs from other sites and contact network participants.
§3Current Work
At the time of the report, system support staff were focused on hardware and design changes. The group's contact with the Network Working Group had therefore been limited. The authors thought participation might grow after the system became operational.
The team was busy preparing the hardware and had little time for network group work. It expected to take a larger part after the connection was working.