RFC 4510 PROPOSED STANDARD DIRECTORY · LDAP · STANDARDS

LDAP road map: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map

A guide to the documents that together define the LDAP version 3 technical specification.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
June 2006
AUTHORS
K. Zeilenga
STREAM
IETF
BUILDS ON
RFC 2251 — LDAPv3, RFC 2252 — LDAPv3 Attribute Syntaxes, RFC 2253 — LDAP DN strings, RFC 2254 — The String Representation of LDAP Search Filters, RFC 2255 — LDAP URL, RFC 2256 — A Summary of the X.500(96) User Schema for use with LDAPv3, RFC 2829 — LDAP authentication, RFC 2830 — LDAP over TLS, RFC 3377 — LDAPv3 specification, RFC 3771 — The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Intermediate Response Message
LDAP VERSION
3
COMPANION DOCUMENTS
9
X.500 EDITION
X.500 (1993)
EARLIER RFCS OBSOLETED
2251-2256, 2829, 2830, 3377, 3771
DOI
10.17487/RFC4510
ERRATA
Reported errata

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Network Working Group                                   K. Zeilenga, Ed.
Request for Comments: 4510                           OpenLDAP Foundation
Obsoletes: 2251, 2252, 2253, 2254, 2255,                       June 2006
           2256, 2829, 2830, 3377, 3771
Category: Standards Track


             Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP):
                    Technical Specification Road Map

Status of This Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

Abstract

   The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) is an Internet
   protocol for accessing distributed directory services that act in
   accordance with X.500 data and service models.  This document
   provides a road map of the LDAP Technical Specification.

1.  The LDAP Technical Specification

   The technical specification detailing version 3 of the Lightweight
   Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), an Internet Protocol, consists of
   this document and the following documents:

      LDAP: The Protocol [RFC4511]
      LDAP: Directory Information Models [RFC4512]
      LDAP: Authentication Methods and Security Mechanisms [RFC4513]
      LDAP: String Representation of Distinguished Names [RFC4514]
      LDAP: String Representation of Search Filters [RFC4515]
      LDAP: Uniform Resource Locator [RFC4516]
      LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules [RFC4517]
      LDAP: Internationalized String Preparation [RFC4518]
      LDAP: Schema for User Applications [RFC4519]
   The terms "LDAP" and "LDAPv3" are commonly used to refer informally
   to the protocol specified by this technical specification.  The LDAP
   suite, as defined here, should be formally identified in other
   documents by a normative reference to this document.

   LDAP is an extensible protocol.  Extensions to LDAP may be specified
   in other documents.  Nomenclature denoting such combinations of
   LDAP-plus-extensions is not defined by this document but may be
   defined in some future document(s).  Extensions are expected to be
   truly optional.  Considerations for the LDAP extensions described in
   BCP 118, RFC 4521 [RFC4521] fully apply to this revision of the LDAP
   Technical Specification.

   IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) considerations for LDAP
   described in BCP 64, RFC 4520 [RFC4520] apply fully to this revision
   of the LDAP technical specification.

1.1.  Conventions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119].

2.  Relationship to X.500

   This technical specification defines LDAP in terms of [X.500] as an
   X.500 access mechanism.  An LDAP server MUST act in accordance with
   the X.500 (1993) series of International Telecommunication Union -
   Telecommunication Standardization (ITU-T) Recommendations when
   providing the service.  However, it is not required that an LDAP
   server make use of any X.500 protocols in providing this service.
   For example, LDAP can be mapped onto any other directory system so
   long as the X.500 data and service models [X.501][X.511], as used in
   LDAP, are not violated in the LDAP interface.

   This technical specification explicitly incorporates portions of
   X.500(93).  Later revisions of X.500 do not automatically apply to
   this technical specification.

3.  Relationship to Obsolete Specifications

   This technical specification, as defined in Section 1, obsoletes
   entirely the previously defined LDAP technical specification defined
   in RFC 3377 (and consisting of RFCs 2251-2256, 2829, 2830, 3771, and
   3377 itself).  The technical specification was significantly
   reorganized.

   This document replaces RFC 3377 as well as Section 3.3 of RFC 2251.
   [RFC4512] replaces portions of RFC 2251, RFC 2252, and RFC 2256.
   [RFC4511] replaces the majority RFC 2251, portions of RFC 2252, and
   all of RFC 3771.  [RFC4513] replaces RFC 2829, RFC 2830, and portions
   of RFC 2251.  [RFC4517] replaces the majority of RFC 2252 and
   portions of RFC 2256.  [RFC4519] replaces the majority of RFC 2256.
   [RFC4514] replaces RFC 2253.  [RFC4515] replaces RFC 2254.  [RFC4516]
   replaces RFC 2255.

   [RFC4518] is new to this revision of the LDAP technical
   specification.

   Each document of this specification contains appendices summarizing
   changes to all sections of the specifications they replace.  Appendix
   A.1 of this document details changes made to RFC 3377.  Appendix A.2
   of this document details changes made to Section 3.3 of RFC 2251.

   Additionally, portions of this technical specification update and/or
   replace a number of other documents not listed above.  These
   relationships are discussed in the documents detailing these portions
   of this technical specification.

4.  Security Considerations

   LDAP security considerations are discussed in each document
   comprising the technical specification.

5.  Acknowledgements

   This document is based largely on RFC 3377 by J. Hodges and R.
   Morgan, a product of the LDAPBIS and LDAPEXT Working Groups.  The
   document also borrows from RFC 2251 by M. Wahl, T. Howes, and S.
   Kille, a product of the ASID Working Group.

   This document is a product of the IETF LDAPBIS Working Group.

6.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]     Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
                 Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC4511]     Sermersheim, J., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access
                 Protocol (LDAP): The Protocol", RFC 4511, June 2006.

   [RFC4512]     Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
                 (LDAP): Directory Information Models", RFC 4512, June
                 2006.

   [RFC4513]     Harrison, R., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access
                 Protocol (LDAP): Authentication Methods and Security
                 Mechanisms", RFC 4513, June 2006.

   [RFC4514]     Zeilenga, K., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access
                 Protocol (LDAP): String Representation of Distinguished
                 Names", RFC 4514, June 2006.

   [RFC4515]     Smith, M., Ed. and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory
                 Access Protocol (LDAP): String Representation of Search
                 Filters", RFC 4515, June 2006.

   [RFC4516]     Smith, M., Ed. and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory
                 Access Protocol (LDAP): Uniform Resource Locator", RFC
                 4516, June 2006.

   [RFC4517]     Legg, S., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
                 (LDAP): Syntaxes and Matching Rules", RFC 4517, June
                 2006.

   [RFC4518]     Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
                 (LDAP): Internationalized String Preparation", RFC
                 4518, June 2006.

   [RFC4519]     Sciberras, A., Ed., "Lightweight Directory Access
                 Protocol (LDAP): Schema for User Applications", RFC
                 4519, June 2006.

   [RFC4520]     Zeilenga, K., "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
                 (IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight Directory
                 Access Protocol (LDAP)", BCP 64, RFC 4520, June 2006.

   [RFC4521]     Zeilenga, K., "Considerations for LDAP Extensions", BCP
                 118, RFC 4521, June 2006.

   [X.500]       International Telecommunication Union -
                 Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The
                 Directory -- Overview of concepts, models and
                 services", X.500(1993) (also ISO/IEC 9594-1:1994).

   [X.501]       International Telecommunication Union -
                 Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The
                 Directory -- Models", X.501(1993) (also ISO/IEC 9594-
                 2:1994).

   [X.511]       International Telecommunication Union -
                 Telecommunication Standardization Sector, "The
                 Directory: Abstract Service Definition", X.511(1993)
                 (also ISO/IEC 9594-3:1993).

Appendix A.  Changes to Previous Documents

   This appendix outlines changes this document makes relative to the
   documents it replaces (in whole or in part).

A.1. Changes to RFC 3377

   This document is nearly a complete rewrite of RFC 3377 as much of the
   material of RFC 3377 is no longer applicable.  The changes include
   redefining the terms "LDAP" and "LDAPv3" to refer to this revision of
   the technical specification.

A.2. Changes to Section 3.3 of RFC 2251

   The section was modified slightly (the word "document" was replaced
   with "technical specification") to clarify that it applies to the
   entire LDAP technical specification.

Author's Address

   Kurt D. Zeilenga
   OpenLDAP Foundation

   EMail: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org

Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
   Administrative Support Activity (IASA).

ISO Plain Language

On this page
PROBLEMThe LDAP version 3 specification was distributed across documents that had been revised and reorganized, making it unclear which texts formed the current technical specification.
MECHANISMRFC 4510 lists the companion documents and describes how the suite relates to X.500 and to the earlier LDAP RFCs.
WHY IT MATTERSThe revised LDAP suite consists of this road map and nine companion RFCs. RFC 4510 obsoletes RFC 3377 and nine earlier LDAP RFCs.

§1The LDAP Technical Specification

The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) is an Internet protocol for accessing distributed directory services that follow X.500 data and service models. RFC 4510 is a road map; the protocol itself is defined in the companion documents it lists.

The LDAP version 3 technical specification consists of this RFC and nine others. They cover the protocol, directory information models, authentication and security, distinguished names, search filters, LDAP URLs, syntaxes and matching rules, internationalized strings, and the user-application schema.

In other documents, “LDAP” and “LDAPv3” are informal names for the protocol defined by this technical specification. The suite should be identified formally by a normative reference to RFC 4510.

This document is the index to the LDAP version 3 specification. It points to the companion RFC for each major part of the protocol.

§1The Nine Companion RFCs

RFC 4511 defines the LDAP protocol, and RFC 4512 defines directory information models. Authentication methods and security mechanisms are in RFC 4513. RFCs 4514, 4515, and 4516 define string formats for distinguished names and search filters, and the LDAP URL.

RFC 4517 covers syntaxes and matching rules, RFC 4518 covers internationalized string preparation, and RFC 4519 defines the schema for user applications. RFC 4518 is new to this revision; the other documents revise earlier parts of the suite.

Each companion RFC covers a separate topic, such as messages, names, security, or schema. Read the document for the topic you need, and use the suite together for the full specification.

§2How LDAP Relates to X.500

The technical specification defines LDAP as an X.500 access mechanism. An LDAP server must follow the X.500 (1993) recommendations when it provides the service, but it does not have to use X.500 protocols internally.

LDAP may be mapped onto another directory system as long as the X.500 data and service models used by LDAP are preserved at the LDAP interface. The specification incorporates parts of X.500(93); later revisions of X.500 do not automatically apply.

An LDAP server may use different internal technology, but it must present the data and service behavior required by X.500 (1993). Newer X.500 revisions do not automatically change this specification.

§3Earlier LDAP Specifications Replaced

RFC 4510 obsoletes the previous technical specification in RFC 3377, which consisted of RFCs 2251 through 2256, 2829, 2830, and 3771, as well as RFC 3377 itself. The suite was reorganized, and RFC 4510 replaces RFC 3377 and a section of RFC 2251.

The companion RFCs replace portions or all of the earlier protocol documents. RFC 4511 replaces most of RFC 2251, parts of RFC 2252, and all of RFC 3771. RFC 4513 replaces RFC 2829 and RFC 2830; RFCs 4514, 4515, and 4516 replace RFCs 2253, 2254, and 2255 respectively.

Each companion document includes appendices describing changes to the material it replaces.

The new suite replaces the earlier collection of LDAP RFCs and redistributes their material. Each companion document explains its own changes.

§1Optional LDAP Extensions

LDAP can be extended by other documents. Extensions are expected to be truly optional, so that the base protocol remains available without them. RFC 4521's considerations for LDAP extensions apply to this revision, as do the IANA considerations in RFC 4520.

This road map does not define a name for combinations of LDAP and extensions; it notes that a future document may do so.

Other documents can add LDAP features, but those extensions are expected to remain optional. This road map does not define a special name for LDAP combined with extensions.

§4Where LDAP Security Is Specified

RFC 4510 adds no security rules of its own. It states that LDAP security considerations are discussed in each document that makes up the technical specification.

RFC 4513 is the suite document on authentication methods and security mechanisms, so it is the relevant companion for those topics.

Security details are in the companion RFCs, not in this road map. RFC 4513 covers authentication methods and security mechanisms.

§7References