RFC 5957 PROPOSED STANDARD IMAP · EMAIL · SORTING

IMAP SORT display: Display-Based Address Sorting for the IMAP4 SORT Extension

IMAP sort criteria that use displayed names in From and To addresses.

On rfc-editor.org ↗
PUBLISHED
July 2010
AUTHORS
D. Karp
STREAM
IETF
BUILDS ON
RFC 5256 — IMAP SORT/THREAD
CAPABILITY
SORT=DISPLAY
SORT CRITERIA
DISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO
DOI
10.17487/RFC5957

RFC text

Contents
Original text · RFC Editor View on rfc-editor.org ↗
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                           D. Karp
Request for Comments: 5957                                        Zimbra
Updates: 5256                                                  July 2010
Category: Standards Track
ISSN: 2070-1721


       Display-Based Address Sorting for the IMAP4 SORT Extension

Abstract

   This document describes an IMAP protocol extension enabling server-
   side message sorting on the commonly displayed portion of the From
   and To header fields.

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5957.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1. Introduction ....................................................2
   2. Conventions Used in This Document ...............................2
   3. DISPLAY Sort Value for an Address ...............................2
   4. The DISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO Sort Criteria .....................3
   5. Formal Syntax ...................................................3
   6. Security Considerations .........................................3
   7. Internationalization Considerations .............................4
   8. IANA Considerations .............................................4
   9. Normative References ............................................4

1.  Introduction

   The [SORT] extension to the [IMAP] protocol provides a means for the
   server-based sorting of messages.  It defines a set of sort criteria
   and the mechanism for determining the sort value of a message for
   each such ordering.

   The [SORT] FROM and TO orderings sort messages lexically on the
   [IMAP] addr-mailbox of the first address in the message's From and To
   headers, respectively.  This document provides two alternative
   orderings, DISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO, which sort messages based on
   the first From or To address's [IMAP] addr-name (generally the same
   as its [RFC5322] display-name), when present.

   A server that supports the full [SORT] extension as well as both the
   DISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO sort criteria indicates this by returning
   "SORT=DISPLAY" in its CAPABILITY response.

2.  Conventions Used in This Document

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

3.  DISPLAY Sort Value for an Address

   For the purposes of the sort criteria defined in this document, the
   sort value for an [IMAP] address structure is defined as follows:

   o  If the address structure's [IMAP] addr-name is non-NIL, apply the
      procedure from [RFC5255], Section 4.6.  (That is, decode any
      [RFC2047] encoded-words and convert the resulting character string
      into a charset valid for the currently active [RFC4790] collation,
      with a default of UTF-8.)  If the resulting octet string is not
      the empty string, use it as the sort value for the address.

   o  Otherwise, if the address structure's [IMAP] addr-mailbox and
      [IMAP] addr-host are both non-NIL, the sort value for the address
      is addr-mailbox@addr-host.

   o  Otherwise, if the address structure's [IMAP] addr-mailbox is non-
      NIL, the sort value for the address is its addr-mailbox.

   o  If none of the above conditions are met, the sort value for the
      address is the empty string.

4.  The DISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO Sort Criteria

   This document introduces two new [SORT] sort criteria, DISPLAYFROM
   and DISPLAYTO.  A message's sort value under these orderings MUST be
   derived as follows:

   A "derived-addr" value is created from the [IMAP] envelope structure
   resulting from a FETCH ENVELOPE on the message.  For DISPLAYFROM, the
   derived-addr value is the [IMAP] env-from value.  For DISPLAYTO, the
   derived-addr value is the [IMAP] env-to value.

   o  If the derived-addr value is NIL, the message's sort value is the
      empty string.

   o  Otherwise, the message's sort value is the DISPLAY sort value of
      the first [IMAP] address in the derived-addr value.

5.  Formal Syntax

   The following syntax specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur
   Form (ABNF) notation as specified in [RFC5234].  [IMAP] defines the
   non-terminal "capability", and [SORT] defines "sort-key".

   capability    =/ "SORT=DISPLAY"

   sort-key      =/ "DISPLAYFROM" / "DISPLAYTO"

6.  Security Considerations

   This document defines an additional IMAP4 capability.  As such, it
   does not change the underlying security considerations of [IMAP].
   The author believes that no new security issues are introduced with
   this additional IMAP4 capability.

7.  Internationalization Considerations

   DISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO are string-based sort criteria.  As stated
   in [SORT], the active [RFC4790] collation as per [RFC5255] MUST be
   used when sorting such strings.

   The DISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO orderings sort on the full decoded
   [IMAP] addr-name, when present.  They do not attempt to parse this
   string in a locale- or language-dependent manner in order to
   determine and sort on some semantically meaningful substring such as
   the surname.

8.  IANA Considerations

   [IMAP] capabilities are registered by publishing a Standards Track or
   IESG-approved Experimental RFC.  This document constitutes
   registration of the SORT=DISPLAY capability in the [IMAP]
   capabilities registry.

9.  Normative References

   [IMAP]     Crispin, M., "INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION
              4rev1", RFC 3501, March 2003.

   [RFC2047]  Moore, K., "MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions)
              Part Three: Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text",
              RFC 2047, November 1996.

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

   [RFC4790]  Newman, C., Duerst, M., and A. Gulbrandsen, "Internet
              Application Protocol Collation Registry", RFC 4790, March
              2007.

   [RFC5234]  Crocker, D., Ed., and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for
              Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January
              2008.

   [RFC5255]  Newman, C., Gulbrandsen, A., and A. Melnikov, "Internet
              Message Access Protocol Internationalization", RFC 5255,
              June 2008.

   [RFC5322]  Resnick, P., Ed., "Internet Message Format", RFC 5322,
              October 2008.

   [SORT]     Crispin, M. and K. Murchison, "Internet Message Access
              Protocol - SORT and THREAD Extensions", RFC 5256, June
              2008.

Author's Address

   Dan Karp
   Zimbra
   3401 Hillview Avenue
   Palo Alto, CA  94304
   USA

   EMail: dkarp@zimbra.com
   URI:   http://www.zimbra.com

ISO Plain Language

On this page
PROBLEMThe existing IMAP SORT FROM and TO criteria order messages by the mailbox part rather than the displayed name.
MECHANISMDISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO use the first address's display name when available and otherwise fall back to mailbox data.
WHY IT MATTERSThe extension adds the SORT=DISPLAY capability and updates RFC 5256.

§1Sorting by the Name People See

The IMAP SORT extension provides server-side message sorting. Its FROM and TO criteria sort lexically on the mailbox part of the first address in the corresponding header.

This RFC adds DISPLAYFROM and DISPLAYTO, which use the first address's display name when present. A server supporting SORT and both new criteria advertises SORT=DISPLAY.

The new criteria sort by the displayed name rather than only the mailbox part. The server announces support with SORT=DISPLAY.

§2How an Address Gets a Sort Value

If an address has a display name, the server decodes encoded words and converts the text to a charset valid for the active collation, defaulting to UTF-8. If that value is empty, or no display name exists, the server falls back to mailbox-at-host, then mailbox alone, and finally the empty string.

DISPLAYFROM uses the first address in the envelope's from value; DISPLAYTO uses the first address in the envelope's to value. If the selected envelope value is NIL, the sort value is empty.

The server uses the decoded display name when it is available. Otherwise it uses the email address, or an empty value if neither is present.

§3Collation, Security, and Registration

The criteria sort strings using the active collation. They use the full decoded display name and do not try to identify a meaningful substring such as a surname.

The author says the capability adds no new security issues. The RFC registers SORT=DISPLAY in the IMAP capabilities registry.

Sorting compares the full decoded name, not a guessed part of it. The RFC says the added capability does not change IMAP security considerations.

§4References