Revised Telnet status option
A revision of the Telnet STATUS option for asking about current option settings.
Crocker, D., "Revised Telnet status option", RFC 651, DOI 10.17487/RFC0651, October 1974, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc651>.
@misc{rfc651,
series = {Request for Comments},
number = 651,
howpublished = {RFC 651},
publisher = {RFC Editor},
doi = {10.17487/RFC0651},
url = {https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc651},
author = {D. Crocker},
title = {{Revised Telnet status option}},
pagetotal = 2,
year = 1974,
month = oct,
} RFC text
Revised Telnet Status Option
NIC 31154 (25 Oct. 74)
Request for Comments: 651
D. Crocker (UCLA-NMC) 25 Oct. 74
RFC# 651
Online file: <[ISI]<DCROCKER>STATUS-OPTION-REVISION.RNO
Revised Telnet Status Option
1. Command name and code
STATUS 5
2. Command meanings
As described in the NAOL and NAOP option specifications, this option applies
to a simplex connection.
IAC DO STATUS
Sender of DO wishes to be able to send requests for status-of-options
information, or confirms that he is willing to send such requests.
IAC WILL STATUS
Sender of WILL wishes or agrees to send status information,
spontaneously or in response to future requests.
IAC DON'T STATUS
Sender refuses to carry on any further discussion of the current
status of options.
IAC WON'T STATUS
Sender refuses to carry on any further discussion of the current
status of options.
IAC SB STATUS SEND IAC SE
Sender requests receiver to transmit his (the receiver's) perception
of the current status of Telnet options. The code for SEND is 1. (See
below.)
IAC SB STATUS IS ... IAC SE
Sender is stating his perception of the current status of Telnet
options. The code for IS is 0. (See below.)
3. Default
DON'T STATUS/WON'T STATUS. That is, the current status of options will not
be discussed.
4. Motivation for the option
This option allows a user/process to verify the current status of Telnet
options (e.g., echoing) as viewed by the person/process on the other end of
the Telnet connection. Simply renegotiating options could lead to the
nonterminating request loop problem discussed in (NIC #16237). The changes
to the option, described in this paper, allow STATUS to fit into the normal
structure of Telnet options, by deferring the actual transfer of status
information to the SB command. Additionally, the numbers of bytes that must
be sent to describe the state of the options has been considerably reduced.
5. Description of the option
WILL/DO are now used only to obtain and grant permission for future
discussion. The actual exchange of status information occurs within option
subcommands (IAC SB STATUS...).
Once the two hosts have exchanged a WILL and a DO, the sender of the WILL
STATUS is free to transmit status information, spontaneously or in response
to a request from the sender of the DO. At worst, this may lead to
transmitting the information twice. Only the sender of the DO may send
requests (IAC SB STATUS SEND IAC SE) and only the sender of the WILL may
transmit actual status information (within an IAC SB STATUS IS ... IAC SE
command).
IS has the subcommands WILL, DO and SB. They are used EXACTLY as used during
the actual negotiation of Telnet options, except that SB is terminated with
SE, rather than IAC SE. Transmission of SE, as a regular data byte, is
accomplished by doubling the byte (SE SE). Options that are not explicitly
described are assumed to be in their default states. A single IAC SB STATUS
IS ... IAC SE describes the condition of ALL options.
The following is an example of use of the option:
Host1: IAC DO STATUS
Host2: IAC WILL STATUS
(Host2 is now free to send status information at any time.
Solicitations from Host1 are NOT necessary. This should not produce
any dangerous race conditions. At worst, two IS's will be sent.
Host1 (perhaps): IAC SB STATUS SEND IAC SE
Host2 (the following stream is broken into multiple lines only for
readability. No carriage returns are implied.):
IAC SB STATUS IS
WILL ECHO
DO SUPPRESS-GO-AHEAD
WILL STATUS
DO STATUS
WILL RCTE
SB RCTE <11><1><24> SE
DO NAOL
SB NAOL DS <66> SE
IAC SE
Explanation of Host2's perceptions: It is responsible for echoing back
the data characters it receives over the Telnet connection; it will not
send Go-Ahead signals; it will both issue and request Status information;
it will send instruction for controlling the other side's terminal
printer; it will discuss the line width for data it is sending.
ISO Plain Language
On this page
§1The Telnet STATUS Option
STATUS is Telnet option 5. It lets a user or process verify the current status of options, such as echoing, as seen by the other end. By default, each side uses DON'T STATUS or WON'T STATUS, so the option status is not discussed.
The revision places the actual status exchange in subnegotiation, which fits the normal structure of Telnet options and avoids using option renegotiation just to inspect current state.
STATUS lets one end ask what settings the other end currently believes are in effect. The default is not to exchange this information.
§2Permission and Status Requests
DO STATUS means the sender wants to send status requests or confirms it is willing to send them. WILL STATUS means the sender agrees to provide status, either spontaneously or in response to a request. These commands grant permission for later discussion; the actual status information is sent in subcommands.
Only the sender of DO may send IAC SB STATUS SEND IAC SE, where SEND is code 1. Only the sender of WILL may send IAC SB STATUS IS ... IAC SE, where IS is code 0. The WILL side may send status without a request, so a request can result in duplicate reports at worst.
First the endpoints agree that status information may be exchanged. The DO side can request a report, and the WILL side sends the report.
- IAC DO STATUS
- IAC WILL STATUS
- IAC SB STATUS SEND IAC SEOptional request for a status report.
- IAC SB STATUS IS ... IAC SEReports current option states.
§3Reading an IS Report
An IS report uses WILL, DO, and SB entries in the same way as ordinary Telnet option negotiation. In this report, SB is terminated by SE rather than IAC SE. To send an SE byte as ordinary data, the byte is doubled.
Options not explicitly described in the report are assumed to be in their default states, so one IS subcommand describes the condition of all options.
The IS report lists options that are not in their default state. Any option it leaves out is assumed to be at its default setting.